Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Volume 7

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Volume 7

List price: US$22.40

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1891 edition. Excerpt: ...Defendant and referred to in paragraph 12 of the Statement of Claim, and he did not admit any of the allegations therein contained. (16). The Defendant denied the allegations contained in paragraph 13 of the Statement of Claim. (17). The Plaintiffs were not entitled to the relief claimed by them, and the Defendant submitted the action should be dismissed. The Defendant delivered the following particulars of objections to the Plaintiffs' patents. As to N 0. 1349, that J. S. llleDougall was not the first and true inventor; that the alleged invention was not new or useful, and was not proper subject matter; that the Specification did not sufficiently describe and ascertain the nature of the alleged invention, &c., and was vague, insufficient, and framed so as to mislead; that the invention did not essentially differ from other inventions in public use, and was generally known; that the Specification merely described and claimed the application of a well-known method or process to identical or analogous purposes. That the invention was published by various specifications and books and had been previously used and published by vgrious named persons. Similar particulars were also given as to the patent No. 257. The Plaintiffs thereupon gave notice of motion to strike out paragraphs 1--5, and 9 of the defence, and the particulars delivered therewith, as being unnecessary and embarrassing, or in the alternative for various particulars, for inspection of the Defendant's works and processes and for liberty to take samples. This report only deals with that part of the motion relating to the pleadings. The motion was heard before Vice-Chancellor Bristowe on the 27th of February, 1890. Maberley (instructed by Thomas Chorlton, of...
show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 364 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 19mm | 649g
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236955110
  • 9781236955111