Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana Volume 35
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1883 edition. Excerpt: ...A man may by implication create as strong a liability as he can by an express promise. Take the case under consideration as an illustration. There were seven cases pending against Hereth and Langsdale. It was expected that the cases would be appealed to the Supreme Court. Hereth and the plaintiff both swear that Hereth employed the plaintiff in those cases for the sole and express purpose of taking down the evidence so that it could be embodied in bills of exceptions, and agreed to and did pay him one hundred dollars for such services. The plaintiff further testifies that the defendant came to his office, after the cases had been tried in the court below, and wanted him to prepare the cases for the Supreme Court; that he informed the defendant of the nature and extent of his employment in the cases by Hereth, that his employment had terminated, and that he could render no further services in the cases unless he was paid therefor; and thereupon, the defendant had told him to go ahead and do the work. But suppose he made no promise and never agreed to pay him for such services, would it be seriously insisted, under such a state of facts, that defendant would not be liable for such services? And yet there would be no express agreement to pay, but there would be a very strong implied obligation Ve do not wish to be understood as saying that the above are the facts in this case; for the plaintiff says that there was an express promise on the part of the defendant to pay him while the defendant contradicts the plaintiff in nearly every essential particular. But suppose that both the plaintiff and the defendant had sworn that the facts were as above stated, would not the jury have understood from the above instruction that the defendant would...
- Paperback | 202 pages
- 189 x 246 x 11mm | 372g
- 13 Sep 2013
- Illustrations, black and white