Reports of Cases Decided in the High Court of Madras Volume 1

Reports of Cases Decided in the High Court of Madras Volume 1

By (author) 

List price: US$22.41

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1864 edition. Excerpt: shall be registered as therein mentioned, and the case shall proceed in all other respects as a regular appeal, and shall be subject to all the rules thereinbefore provided for such appeals so far as the same shall be applicable. But it clear that this section is to be read in connection with the provision relating to the grounds of special appeals. The application, it is expressly provided, must state some ground on which a. special appeal will lie under section 372 of Act VIII of 1859. And on the whole it is obvious that no rights are given by section 25 of Act XXIII of 1861 which are inconsistent with section 372 of the former_Act. We must therefore now confine ourselves 1363. to such objections, if any, as are made consistently with that--_s-1jLZ%E_'--6 section: Mr. Branson grants that the Civil Judge's decision is __if__1 fi__ not contrary to law or usage, and that there has been no sub stantial error or defect in La/w in the procedure or investigation of the case; and we must accordingly dismiss this appeal. Fnsmz, J. concurred. A ppcal clismissed. Qlpprllate 3m'isIn'ttl'nu (a) Special Appeal No. 576 of 1861. NA'YAN M.n1_n and others.........AppeLlant.s. G0'DA SHAEIGARA.....................Responde-nt. Before the enactment of Act VIII of 1859 asuit could not be hi-ought for a mere declaration of title without conse uential relief. A suit cannot be brought against severzd defendants to eject one and to obtain a declaration of title against the rest. Mal:23i2 THIS was a special appeal from the decision of E. Cullin Lqzfimi the Principal Sadr Amin of Cochin, in Appeal Suit C N o. 128 of 1857, aflirming the decree of the District Munsif of Vcllanjodc, in Original Suit N o. 35 of 1855. The suit was brought more

Product details

  • Paperback | 174 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 9mm | 322g
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236895606
  • 9781236895608