Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Ohio Circuit Courts V.1-35 Ohio Circuit Decisions Volume 28

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Ohio Circuit Courts V.1-35 Ohio Circuit Decisions Volume 28

By (author) 

List price: US$37.62

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1919 edition. Excerpt: ...last specification of error is based on the contention that with respect to substantially one hundred and fifty names on the petition, the only evidence as to the term of residence in the district consisted of the registers of Lucas County Appeals., electors. It appears that the registers for that district for the years 19l5 and 1916 were introduced in evidence. The judge before whom the petition was heard held that these registers were competent and sufficient evidence to make a prima facie case of residence within the district for the statutory period. We hold that the judge in so ruling committed no error. No good cause being shown for granting the motion for leave to file a petition in error, the same will be denied. EVIDENC-E--MUNIClPAL CORPORATIONS. Hamilton (lst) Court of Appeals, February 28, 1916. Previous Accident at Same Place and from Same Cause Competent to Show Knowledge of Municipality that Dangerous Condition Exlsted. Evidence in an action against a municipality for injuries from falling into a manhole. alleged to have been covered with a lid which tilted when stepped upon to the eflect that other persons had fallen into the same hole, previous to the accident to plaintiff is admissible for the purpose of showing constructive notice to the city of the defective and dangerous condition of said lid. and its exclusion is prejudicial. Thus. L. lllic-hie, James J. Mc(7a1-tin and H. P. Karch, for plaintifi in error. Walter M. Schoenle, City Sol, and Saul Zielvnka, for defendant in error. GORMAN, J. Plaintifi in error brought an action against the defendant in error in the superior court of Cincinnati to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by her by the turning of an iron lid or covering on more

Product details

  • Paperback | 256 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 14mm | 463g
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236897420
  • 9781236897428