Practice Act of the State of Connecticut; With the Orders, Rules and Forms Under the Same Prepared by the Judges of the Superior Court and the General Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Errors and of the Superior, as Revised in

Practice Act of the State of Connecticut; With the Orders, Rules and Forms Under the Same Prepared by the Judges of the Superior Court and the General Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Errors and of the Superior, as Revised in

List price: US$19.99

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks

Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1879 edition. Excerpt: ...has been made to this Court by John Doe of New Haven, to wit: (Recite complaint.) And whereas it has been ordered by this Court that a rule to show cause issue thereon, These are, therefore, to require you to appear before this Court, at New Haven, on the 15th day of September, 1879, at o'clock in the noon, then and there to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not be issued against you. By order of Court. Clerk. Superior Court, New Haven County, September Term, 1879. To the Sheriff of New Haven County, or his deputy: By authority of the State of Connecticut you are hereby commanded to leave a true and attested copy of the foregoing rule to show cause with each of the defendants thereto, to wit: James Fen of Orange, and David Dun, Esquire, of New Haven, on or before the 12th day of September, 1879. Hereof fail not, but make due service and return. By order of Court. Clerk. 245. Against patmbroker, for a return of a pledge; alternatively, for damages for its conversion. 1. In October, 1878, in consideration of a sum of money lent to the plaintiff by the defendant, the plaintiff delivered to the defendant by way of pledge for said loan, to be re-delivered to the plaintiff on his paying the defendant the amount of said loan and interest, a gold watch, which was a gift to the plaintiff from his father, who has since deceased. 2. The plaintiff has repaid the defendant the amount of said loan and interest. 3. The defendant refused to deliver said watch to the plaintiff on his repaying said loan and interest, and still refuses so to do. The plaintiff claims 1. A return of said watch, by way of equitable relief, or else 2. $500 damages. 246. For the re-delivery of goods left in pledge, and an injunction. 1. On May 1st, 1878, the defendant lent the...show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 94 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 5mm | 181g
  • Rarebooksclub.com
  • Miami Fl, United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236597230
  • 9781236597236