Philosophical Fragments of Your Ancient Name

Philosophical Fragments of Your Ancient Name

By (author) 

Free delivery worldwide

Available. Dispatched from the UK in 4 business days
When will my order arrive?


New Edition! Revised and Expanded! This edition contains a new chapter on the global climate change movement: the science, economics, politics and consciousness. It's expanded and includes discussions on modern scientific cartesianism, cultural imprinting, theological practice and mystical phenomena. The book opens with a peek into the cosmos at large as seen through the lens of modern science. The next chapter focuses that lens on the fast evolving climate change movement. Then we dig into how we treat one other and the roles we play in secular society. We'll try to figure out why we need to do the things we do. We end by exploring the roles public religion plays in public life and the nature of the gods we worship. Excerpt. (c) Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. "2.5.1 The Romantic and The Scientist The scientific revolution of the 17th Century created the industrial revolution of the 19th. 20th Century acceleration in technological innovation multiplied our ability to dominate. In this century we will save the planet, as long as it submits to our solutions. Populist climate change consciousness is a sign that scientific fragmentation through specialism has reached an extreme. Our technologies, gadgets, scientific instruments, turned outwardly to dominate and explore the cosmos are transforming our inner world. Climate change alarmism is driving us to return to our original role as stewards of the earth. Ownership of private property is superseded by collective rights. We come; we leave. The lands and waters stay forever. We can no longer say that we own them. Populist climate change consciousness is pre-Cartesian, pre-Capitalist and post-Democratic. It evokes nostalgia for a simpler, more childlike relationship to earth. But this time we're awake. We've got the tools that centuries of science have armed us with. We can't return to a rear-view nostalgic: a romantic, eco-topian sense of living amidst idyllic nature. We must keep moving forward with the modern Cartesian agenda. The pre-scientific nature mysticism of populist climate change consciousness and modern Cartesian science are opposing philosophies with numerous differences. Nature mysticism, or pantheism believes that earth is a self-healing organism; Scientific Cartesianism believes that earth is a mechanism that needs to be fixed by man when it breaks. Nature mysticism believes that man needs to fuse himself and his activities with nature; Cartesianism believes that man needs to dominate nature by dividing it up. Nature mysticism believes that nature has a soul and that the cosmos is intelligent; Cartesianism believes that nature has no soul and that the cosmos is random. Nature mysticism sustained man's religious, social and agricultural cultures with minor damage to nature for hundreds of thousands of years. Scientific Cartesianism has attacked traditional religious, social and agricultural cultures and caused major damage to nature in less than two centuries. IPCC led official climate change consciousness is Cartesian. It represents a magnification of mechanistic philosophy through the global application of scientific methodology. Its approach rests on the conviction that mathematical formulas govern natural processes. If we but input the right algorithms, the desired outcomes will propagate. This is a new form of numerology, or number mysticism: created by computers, not God. Contrary to populist assumption, IPCC led climate change consciousness has never been about a return to the mythic romantic savage at one with pristine nature."show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 100 pages
  • 133 x 203 x 10mm | 200g
  • Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1500983225
  • 9781500983222

About Doug Bentley

Doug Bentley lives quietly in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada. He is the author of four books currently available here: PHILOSOPHICAL FRAGMENTS OF YOUR ANCIENT NAME: REVISED & EXPANDED a journey of self-discovery into the sanctuary of your soul - and beyond!; A CANADIAN'S POEMS: one of the best kept secrets in Canadian English Poetry today; GO -21st Century Existentialism in an Absurdist Theme: a full-length 4 Act play based on the landmark play by Samuel Beckett, Waiting For Godot; GRAIN -Mystical Poems: an English sonnet sequence of 28 classic love poems and one long contemplation on death and dying. A quick Q&A with the author follows. What inspires you to write? I write poetry and scripts for live theatre. Poetry is perhaps the most private of all the literary forms. In writing "GRAIN -Mystical Poems" I consciously challenged myself to create poetry which is in sync with both the classic music and the evergreen content of the mainstream literature of poetry. It seemed to me that no poetic content was more "evergreen" than the mystical encounter which originates in a deep and personal layer of the soul. In short, the discipline of the genre inspires me to write poetry. I was inspired to write my theatre script "GO" after watching a few of the popular plays by Andrew Lloyd Webber. I am not a fan of his brand of theatre, and wrote this script partially in defiance of the trend of inane entertainment which his plays had spawned. But the project evolved into a much more serious investigation of contemporary existential angst when I learned how to turn philosophical concepts into definable and distinct theatrical characters. The project then took on a momentum of its own and I found myself filling many notepads with lines and snippets of speeches which required several months editing to sort. In short, I was inspired to write the script because I was carried along by the momentum of the characters as they evolved. What advice would you give to aspiring writers? For any writer I think it is most important to write for personal enjoyment first. If other people 'get it', then, that's great! If they don't, then they don't. No harm done. Not everyone will like what you write. For more of this Q&A visit the author's more