Oklahoma Criminal Reports; Cases Determined in the Criminal Court of Appeals of the State of Oklahoma Volume 6

Oklahoma Criminal Reports; Cases Determined in the Criminal Court of Appeals of the State of Oklahoma Volume 6

By (author) 

List price: US$22.40

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks

Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1912 edition. Excerpt: ...with the requirements of the statutes. 2. 'I'RIAL--Verd.ict of Guilty---Pronounc1ng Judgment. Sections 6901 and 6902 (Snyder's Stat.), Procedure Criminal, prescribing that after a verdict of guilty is returned the court must appoint a time for pronouncing judgment at least two days after the verdict, if the court remains in session so long, are intended to guard the rights of defendant from a hasty judgment, and to give the defendant sufficient time to prepare and file tr motion for a new trial, or in arrest of judgment. (Syllabus by the Court.) Appeal from Superior Court, Logan County; J. M. Sandlin, fudge. VVilliam Dalton was convicted of violation of the prohibitory law, and appeals. Affirmed. lohn A. Remy, for plaintiff in error. Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. DOYLE, . Plaintiff in error was convicted in the superior court of Logan county of the crime of having possession of intoxicating liquors, with the intention of violating the provisions of the prohibition law by selling the said liquors. The jury impaneled to try the case, on May 16, 1910, rcturned a verdict. finding the defendant guilty. On May 17th, the defendant filed a motion for a new trial. On june 4th, the court overruled the motion for a new trial, rendered judgment, and sentenced the defendant to serve a term of six months in the county jail, and to pay a fine of $300. To reverse this judgment, an appeal was perfected. Opinion of the Court. It is contended by counsel for plaintiff in error that the judgment rendered and sentence so imposed were contrary to law, in that the court did not appoint a time for pronouncing judgment, as required by sections 6901 and 6902 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provide: Sec. 6901, Snyder's Stat: .show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 290 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 15mm | 522g
  • Rarebooksclub.com
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236942760
  • 9781236942760