Notes on the Ohio and Ohio State Reports; Including the Citations of Each Case as a Precedent, First, by Any Ohio Court of Record, or Any Court of Last Resort in Any Jurisdiction of This Country; And, Second, by the Extensive and Volume 3

Notes on the Ohio and Ohio State Reports; Including the Citations of Each Case as a Precedent, First, by Any Ohio Court of Record, or Any Court of Last Resort in Any Jurisdiction of This Country; And, Second, by the Extensive and Volume 3

By (author) 

List price: US$70.69

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks

Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1912 edition. Excerpt: ...on his premiums. Distinguished in Thompson v. Knickerbocker L. Ins. Co. 104 U. S. 257, 26 L. ed. 767, 39 Phila. Leg. Int. 10; Iowa L. Ins. Co. v. Lewis, 187 U. S. 348, 47 L. ed. 211, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 126, --h0lding that acceptance of note for first premium on policy waives condition of forfeiture for nonpayment of premium, but brings into operation condition by which policy will be void if note not paid at maturity.-For violation of stipulation against additional insurance. Cited in Alabama State Mut. Assur. Co. v. Long Clothing or. Shoe Co. 123 Ala. 675, 26 So. 655, holding that condition in policy against additional insurance without insurer's consent may be waived by insurer by acts or conduct.--Conditlon against incumbrances. Cited in Phcenix ins. L'o. v. Public Parks Amusement. Co. 63 Ark. 203, 37 S. W. 959, holding condition against encumbrances in policy waived by acts oi agents knowing that property was encumbered, in attaching to policy permits for additional concurrent insurance which is issued. 30 OHIO ST. 255, BROADVELL V. PHILLIPS. Acquisition of after acquired title by cstoppel. Cited in note in 37 Am. Dec. 129, on acquisition of alter acquired title by estoppel. 30 OHIO ST. 264, BAINBRIDGE v. STATE. Bar of former jeopardy. Cited in Goodlove v. State, 13 C. C. n. s. 32, 31 C. C. 551; llcamer v. State, 10 C. C. n. s. 133, 29 C. C. 580, --on former conviction as bar to second indictment for same oiiense.--Proot oi former jeopardy. Cited in State v. Zurhorst, 75 O. S. 243, 116 Am. St. Rep. 724, 79 N. E. 238, 9 A. 6: . E. Ann. Cas. 45, on right of defendant upon second indictment for same offense to prove their identity by parol evidence; State v. Creechley, 27 Utah, 150, 75 Pac. 384 (dissenting opinion), on whom the...show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 574 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 29mm | 1,012g
  • Rarebooksclub.com
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236774779
  • 9781236774774