Minnesota Reports; Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Minnesota Volume 22

Minnesota Reports; Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Minnesota Volume 22

List price: US$10.30

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1879 edition. Excerpt: ...Robbins resided at the time he gave the note or at any subsequent time. It does not appear when the suit was commenced in which the judgment rendered July 10 was obtained, nor is it stated that the judgment was ever docketed in Fairbault county. No facts are stated showing the insolvency of the maker of the note, nor any reason why the note was not collectible at any time after its maturity. The averment that the judgment recovered in July remained unpaid and uncollectible on the 21st day of November does not negative the fact that it could have been collected at any time prior to that month. The issuance of an execution to a county different from that wherein the judgment was rendered and docketed, and where, foraught that appears, the judgment debtor did not reside, and its return unsatisfied, is no evidence that the judgment might not have been collected, provided the execution had been properly issued to the oificer of the county wherein it was docketed, or to the county where the judgment debtor resided. For these reasons the demurrer should have been sustained. Order reversed. DANIEL M. Ronnms vs. Sr. PA_n1., STILLWATER & TAYLoR's FALLS RAILROAD COMPANY. November 22, 1875. Condemnation of Land for Railroad--Measure of Compensation-Harmless Error.--In proceedings by a railroad company organized under the general statutes of the state, to condemn an entire lot of land to its use, an instruction to the jury that the question for them to determine was what was the value of the property in question on the day when the report of the commissioners was filed, and that it was their duty to return a verdict for the plaintiff for the amount so determined, (there being nothing in the case to show that the fee of the land, burdened by...
show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 202 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 11mm | 372g
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236964438
  • 9781236964434