Minnesota Liquor Laws; With Decisions of the Supreme Court and Data Regarding Indian Treaties

Minnesota Liquor Laws; With Decisions of the Supreme Court and Data Regarding Indian Treaties

By (author) 

List price: US$15.83

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1911 edition. Excerpt: ...at which place he sells to his customers and patrons intoxicating liquors, who sells such liquors to one in attendance at such place, and thereby renders him drunk and disorderly, well knowing that when in that condition he is likely to commit assaults upon others without cause or provocation, is bound to exercise reasonable care to protect his other customers and patrons from such assaults and insults, and for a failure to do so is liable for damages at the suit of one assaulted and injured. Mastad vs. Swedish Brethren, 83 Minn. 40, 85 N. W. 913. 4. Negligence of saloonkeeper--The plaintiff was injured in the saloon of the defendants by a third party pouring alcohol on his foot while he was asleep, and then setting it on fire. In an action to recover damages for injuries caused thereby, held, that the defendants were bound to use reasonable care to protect the plaintiff, as their guest, from injury at the hands of vicious and lawless persons whom they permitted to be in their saloon. Curran vs. Olson, 88 Minn. 307, 92 N. W. 1124. 5. Tort of servant--The proprietor of a saloon is liable in damages for the death of a person occasioned by an assault committed by the bartender while engaged in ejecting the party from the saloon. In an action to recover damages for such an injury, it is held that the evidence was sufiicient to justify the jury in finding that the bartender assaulted the deceased, in order to injure him and thus make it easier and less dangerous to eject him from the saloon. When an improper question is asked a witness by a trial judge, it is the duty of counsel to interpose an objection, and a failure to do so is a waiver of the right to subsequently take advantage of the error. Certain rulings upon the question of the...
show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 36 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 2mm | 82g
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236829603
  • 9781236829603