Maryland Reports; Cases Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Maryland Volume 133

Maryland Reports; Cases Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Maryland Volume 133

List price: US$9.02

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks

Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1919 edition. Excerpt: ...to Dunn by the deed of January 8th, 1916, and recorded January 10th, 1916. But however that may be, there is nothing whatever in the case to show that the sheriff had not levied on what was claimed to be Dunn's interest in that property and as he contended that both of the judgments were void he had the right to seek the aid of a Court of equity ' to have them declared null and void and to contest Wilmer's right under them to levy on that or any other property. There is therefore no estoppel by reason of what was done in-that case. It follows from what we have said that it is unnecessary to discuss other questions, and the decree of the lower Court must be atfirmed. Decree wflirmed, the appellant to pay the costs. A plaintif f had been injured by the fall of a heavy bale of hay from the defendant's warehouse, and at the time of the trial, about a year after the accident, there was evidence that after and since the injury the plaintiff was subject to violent pains in his head, and he complained that he could not attend to business or concentrate his thoughts; that he could not dictate well, but had to write out first in longhand and then read of f to the stenographer, and that occasionally he had-violent pains in his back; it was held, that upon such evidence the court was not authorized to rule that, as a matter of law, no rational inference could be drawn as to the injuries being permanent. p. 367 Decided December 6th, 1918. Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (DUFFY, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. Joseph Addison and Forrest Bramble (with whom were Barton, Wilmer ti' Stewart on the brief), for the appellants. James J. Lindsay, for the appelleer Opinion of the Court. 133 URNER, J., ...show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 242 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 13mm | 440g
  • Rarebooksclub.com
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236912977
  • 9781236912978