Hawaii Reports; Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii Volume 18

Hawaii Reports; Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii Volume 18

By (author) 

List price: US$8.88

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks

Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1908 edition. Excerpt: ...of the water pipe at the entrance of the lane. It is true it was stated at one of the hearings before the commissioner on Winston's behalf that he was going to remove that and it was stated at the argument in this court that he had done so, but an inspection by the court showed that it had not been removed to a sutticient height to avoid obstruction even to persons on foot. _ Winston's wall is practically on his boundary line at the entrance to the lane, but since it is built on a straight line along the straight part of the lane while the boundaries of his two lots along that side are not quite in 'a straight line, it projects beyond his boundar)v about 4-10 of a foot where the two lots join, but near the rear of the straight part of the lane it runs 2-10 of a foot inside of his boundary; then along the rear of the lane instead of following his boundary it cuts across the first turn, running at the widest point 1.1;") feet outside of his boundary and at the second turn 2.7 feet inside of his boundary. These are the measurements of the government surveyor. The measure ments of other surveyors differ very slightly fro1n these. It is contended by the plaintiff that the coinmissioner erred in not allowing a strip along the straig'l1t part of the lane where the wall projects slightly beyond the boundary and by the defendant Vinston that the commissioner erred in ordering the removal of the wall where it projects beyond the boundary at the first turn. Ve may note in passing as to the plaintiff's contention that she did not appeal, but. irrespective of that, the decision 'annot be reversed as to her contention and must on the same grounds be reversed as to the defcndant's contention. The fence just...show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 236 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 13mm | 426g
  • Rarebooksclub.com
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236773411
  • 9781236773418