Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Colorado Volume 58

Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Colorado Volume 58

By (author) 

List price: US$11.56

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks

Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1915 edition. Excerpt: ...store it in its baggage room on its arrival. There was no delinquency on the part of the company in transporting either plaintiff or her baggage which would excuse her for not calling for and removing it. without delay upon its arrival, or which would extend the reasonable time for its 'removal after it arrived. It was the fault of the passenger that the baggage was not called for and delivered upon its arrival.. By motion for a non-suit; by requested instructions; by a request for a directed verdict; and by motion for a new trial, the court was given ample opportunity to have disposed of the case according to law. It not having done so, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the action. Reversed. CHIEF J USTICE MUSSEB and Mr. J UsTICE HILL concur. No. 8023. CENTRAL TRUsT CoMPANY v. CULVER. 1. APPEAL AND ERRoR--'Finding on Conflicting Evidence, where there is suflicient to support it is conclusive. (335) 2. Error to Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court is restricted by Rule 50 to the consideration of questions which, in the Court of Appeals, are presented and considered on petition for rehearing. The rule applies to both parties. (336) Error to the Court of Appeals. Mr. HUGH MoLEAN, for plaintiff in error. Mr. J oHN A. RUsH, for defendant in error. Per Curiam: (En Bane.) ' Cary Culver brought an action against plaintiff in error to restrain the latter from diverting water from the Little Thompson for the purpose of irrigation. The only issue involved, so far as necessary to consider, was whether the rights awarded the priority under which'defendant claimed, had been abandoned. Trial was to the court, and upon conflicting testimony this issue was determined in favor of plaintiff....show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 202 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 11mm | 372g
  • Rarebooksclub.com
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236823532
  • 9781236823533