Appellate Division-Supreme Court

Appellate Division-Supreme Court

By (author) 

List price: US$10.59

Currently unavailable

Add to wishlist

AbeBooks may have this title (opens in new window).

Try AbeBooks

Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1908 edition. Excerpt: ...whether or not I ever saw that deed before the 3rd of February. I have looked at the date of this paper. When that certificate was made by me, it must have been true. Mr. Cady.--It is collateral. The Court.--You may have it marked for identification. I exclude it as evidence on the objection of the plaintiff. Paper marked Exhibit No. 2 for identifi-229 cation. I could not tell from that paper that Mrs. Sehring appeared before me on the 16th of January, 1900, and made any acknowledgment of proof before me, because that paper has been detached from something else, if she did. She must have given proof of the acknowledgment of a paper before me on the 16th day of January, 1900, according to my signature there. I could not say whether she did or not, but she must have. Under other conditions, she could not have my name signed to it. I have no recollection of it at all. I remember 230 she signed her name on that occasion. I never give a certificate of an acknowledgment on that paper, a piece of paper like that. There has been some other affidavit made that has been torn off of; I never gave Mrs. Sehring that. Mrs. Sehring must have come before me on the 16th day of January, 1900, and made proof of the execution of a paper. I don't know what that paper was. I have no recollection of the incident, not at all. I know that when a subscribing witness comes before a notary to make proof of an instrument, it must be signed by the witness. Q. Would you give a certificate of proof, with-23i out the witness signing it? Mr. Cady.--I object to that as calling for a conclusion of law, and hypothetical. Objection overruled. A. No. By Mr. Cady: When I spoke about Mr. Sias bringing me to 232 Mrs. Sehring's house, I referred to Mr. Sias, the defendant, the...show more

Product details

  • Paperback | 158 pages
  • 189 x 246 x 9mm | 295g
  • Rarebooksclub.com
  • United States
  • English
  • black & white illustrations
  • 1236964446
  • 9781236964441