Theopompus of Chios: History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century BC

Theopompus of Chios: History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century BC

Paperback

By (author) Michael Attyah Flower

Currently unavailable
We can notify you when this item is back in stock

Add to wishlist
OR try AbeBooks who may have this title (opens in new window)

Try AbeBooks
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press
  • Format: Paperback | 276 pages
  • Dimensions: 137mm x 213mm x 18mm | 363g
  • Publication date: 12 February 1998
  • Publication City/Country: Oxford
  • ISBN 10: 0198152434
  • ISBN 13: 9780198152439
  • Edition statement: Reprint

Product description

Theopompus of Chios was one of the most important ancient Greek historians of the fourth century BC. Although his work has survived only in fragments - as quotations and paraphrases in later writers - these are still a rich and vital source of information for Greek political, social, and intellectual history during the age of Philip of Macedon. This book explores both Theopompus' historical method and the intellectual milieu in which he worked, whilst the fragments themselves are placed in 'context' by examining where and why they are cited by later authors. Through this illuminating and original study, the author leads up to some important new conclusions about historical writing in the fourth century BC: he argues that there was no so-called Isocratean school of rhetorical history; that Theopompus used moral explanations typical of Greek thought to account for historical changes; and that oral tradition, as opposed to rhetorical invention, was still vibrant in the fourth century. Professor Flower also provides a critical method for evaluating Theopompus' historical accuracy. All Greek in the book is translated.

Other books in this category

Showing items 1 to 11 of 11
Categories:

Author information

Michael Flower was Visiting Fellow at Wolfson College, Oxford 1993-4

Review quote

F.'s book offers discussion and correction of earlier scholarship ... Points of detail are convincingly argued, and the method of reading fragments in their literary contexts proves to be helpful for isolating Theopompus' voice from the argumentative context in which it is preserved. Anyone who wishes to use Theopompus as an historical source will read F.'s book with profit. Sitta von Reden, University of Bristol, Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 116 (1996) Flower's assessment of Theopompus is sure. Ancient History Bulletin