Book rating: 04 Paperback Orchard Books

By (author) Teri Terry

List price $10.46
You save $0.39 (3%)

Free delivery worldwide
Dispatched in 3 business days
When will my order arrive?

  • Publisher: ORCHARD BOOKS
  • Format: Paperback | 448 pages
  • Dimensions: 130mm x 196mm x 34mm | 422g
  • Publication date: 3 May 2012
  • Publication City/Country: London
  • ISBN 10: 1408319462
  • ISBN 13: 9781408319468
  • Sales rank: 15,729

Product description

Kyla's memory has been erased, her personality wiped blank, her memories lost for ever. She's been Slated. The government claims she was a terrorist, and that they are giving her a second chance - as long as she plays by their rules. But echoes of the past whisper in Kyla's mind. Someone is lying to her, and nothing is as it seems. Who can she trust in her search for the truth? Book 1 in the acclaimed SLATED trilogy.

Other people who viewed this bought:

Showing items 1 to 10 of 10

Other books in this category

Showing items 1 to 11 of 11

Author information

Teri Terry has lived in France, Canada, Australia and England at more addresses than she can count, acquiring four degrees, a selection of passports and a silly name along the way. Moving constantly as a child, teenager and also as an adult has kept Teri on the outside looking in much of her life. It has given her an obsession with characters who don't belong or find themselves in unfamiliar places, like Kyla in Slated. Teri recently completed a research MA on the depiction of terrorism in YA dystopian fiction.

Customer reviews

By Lilian (A Novel Toybox) 26 Jun 2013 3

Finally! A book that is actually a dystopian novel in the classic sense of the word (in which society tries to be an utopia, but with a major flaw,) and not another one of those "let's just call it dystopian and claim its the next Hunger Games while we're at it" novels. In Slated, children under sixteen that are deemed detrimental to society (e.g. criminals, terrorists, rebels) will be given a second chance by having their memories wiped and living with a new adoptive family. Slaters are then required to wear a Levo, a bracelet that monitors happiness and negativity. When the user drops too low, the bracelet shocks the user before they can harm society. At first it seems that all is good, until more and more citizens disappear for trivial misconduct and citizens fear government is abusing their power.

Slated reminded me of why I love the dystopian genre: its speculative nature is thought-provoking and a great starting point for ethical discussions. However, as much as this futuristic dystopia excited me, the novel as a whole did not. It's not that Slated by Teri Terry had many faults, but just that it didn't stand out and felt slightly heavy-handed at times. The slow pace also failed to hold my attention. However, I still think it succeeded in raising important questions like self-identity (without memories, who are you?) and the nature vs. nuture debate.

Heavy-Handed Writing (Stop it! I am not stupid here!):
I am a fan of the dystopian genre for its introspective qualities, its tendency to make us reconsider moral dilemmas. It's because I feel what makes a dystopian novel special hinges on its ability to think that makes me extra critical of how ideas are presented in Slated. It was annoying to hear Ben (the love interest) rant on and on about being mind-controlled by the government, that there was no freedom. Okay! I get it. Freedom = good, Mind-Control = Bad. Duh. Now convince me without shoving it down my throat.Another problem with heavy-handed writing arose when it came to characterizing Kyla. In a scene Kyla cries after eating broccoli (I guess she really does hate broccoli or it reminds her of some traumatic experience--it's never explained.) After her cryfest, Kyla thinks:
"And the way I cried, in great gulpy sobs. I didn't know how to cry, I wasn't good at it: it wasn't something I did."

This sentence annoyed me. It was an obvious (and disastrous) attempt to shoehorn in this notion of Kyla being stronger than she appears, to discount her broccoli breakdown--all because SHE'S NOT GOOD AT CRYING. GASP. IT'S NOT SOMETHING SHE DOES! I didn't even know crying was a skill! Can someone tell me how to be better at crying because apparently "great gulpy sobs" is not the way to go? And how would she know if its something she did? She just had her memory erased! Girl couldn't even figure out how to open a car door. How dare she think she's knowledgeable in the art of crying!

Not Quite Original--At Least To Me:
The more I read, the more Slated seemed like a culmination of other stories I've read. I realize that this is more of a personal issue as I've been reading quite a few "dystopian" novels recently. The reason I mention this is not because I think ideas were copied, but because I think having read these novels hindered my experience with Slated, making me draw parallels amongst them (as I will explain further later.) With that said, Slated read to me like a better version of Theo Lawrence's Mystic City plot-wise, and Kiersten White's Mind Games tone-wise (especially at the end.) If you like either or both of these books, you might really love Slated. If you had issues with them (like I did,) I don't think Slated would win you any favors. If you haven't read them, you are safe. Lastly, social criticism, the foundation of a dystopian story, echoed ideas from George Orwell's 1984 where the government seems to be constantly watching you.

Kyla Davis, The One Who Feels The Need To Constantly Remind Us That She's Different:
The depressing, monotonous voice of Kyla was one of my major issues because it made the story move at a snail-like pace. Here is where having read Kiersten White's Mind Games may have hindered my reading slightly. Kyla's voice reminded me of Fia from Mind Games. Like Fia, there is internal monologue. And while Kyla is not nearly as annoying Fia with her tendency to repeat words like she's on drugs, but Kyla does repeat "Kyla is different." quite a bit. Like Fia, Kyla also acts on instincts--which are never wrong apparently. But we already sense that she's different early on--because she seems to be the only Slated that isn't enjoying life. Her constant reaffirmation of her difference not only seems redundant, but also narcissistic. Yes, Kyla, you are the special snowflake. You really don't have to remind me every ten minutes.

I don't like her and I having her narrate the story wasn't the best idea. She's a reclusive, passive character who seems to spend all her time either running, drawing, and going to therapy. When she's not doing those things, she trains her poker face while trying to navigate around the multitude of adults whose intentions are unclear. She can't trust anyone--except the guy she has the hots for. Even though he isn't too bright. You have to get used to her running because she does it A LOT. Basically one of those characters that don't try to make friends, don't laugh, and are not generally pleasant to be around, but are "bullied," so they automatically turn into a nice person. Or at least decent compared than everyone else. It's really not hard to seem like a nice person, when the entire school is only made up of jealous, shallow teenage girls set on bullying you if their love interest so much as winks at you.

You know that poker face I mentioned earlier? Kyla NEEDS it. If not for her own benefit, then for mines. Apparently Kyla is horrible at keeping secrets because her face is an open book, and there have been countless instances where people say stuff life, "I know you are lying! Tell me the truth!" to Kyla. It gets tiring after awhile, reminding me of those stereotypical girls who think something MUST be wrong if their boyfriends are silent. However, giving a Kyla a reason to always have a poker face made her even more banal. So on top having no personality, she can't even emote her feelings now. The last shreds of hope I had of Kyla being more compelling than a plank of wood just vanished.

Ben, Why Does He Like Kyla?
Enter Mr. Nice Guy, who is obviously Kyla's love interest. I have no idea WHY, but he likes Kyla. Ben makes his intentions clear early, but Kyla spends a huge chunk of the book assuming he likes Tori (the beautiful girl) which was frustrating because evidence shows that they are really just regular friends at best. Why would you think he likes a girl he didn't even realize was missing for days? HE EVEN TOLD YOU THAT THEY ARE JUST FRIENDS AND HE TOLD YOU THAT HE LIKES YOU. Her peers claim that Tori isn't even his type (apparently his type are the incredibly slow and dense boring ones.) Perhaps it's her lack of self-confidence that make it unfathomable for her that anyone would ever like her. I which case, she's not alone. I have no idea why anyone would like her either.

Despite the fact that the adults adore him and his friendliness, Ben is not too bright. Part of it might be due to being Slated, and how it makes you more susceptible to manipulation, but I'm not convinced. Even when he is supposedly free to think for himself--he acts even stupider and doesn't plan things through. He is just so simple-minded!

Here is where reading Theo Lawrence's Mystic City might have influenced my reading experience. Like Slated, Theo Lawrence's Mystic City is also about a girl who has her memory erased. In Mystic City, the protagonist forgets her rebel boyfriend. I am NOT sure if this is what happened in Slated, but there are clues to it plausible as Kyla claims Ben to feel familiar in many instances. In Mystic City, I felt that establishing the lovers past relationship was a cop-out to making it "okay" for the lovers to make sickeningly saccharine love proclamations. "It isn't instalove! They really had a deep and passionate relationship! I PROMISE. JUST TRUST ME. So it it's okay for them to claim that they can't live without one another!" It was a sign of weakness in Mystic City, and I was glad Slated didn't resort to that (though I was very suspicious.) However, another part of me thinks this it might benefit Slated if our couple did have a past history, because right now--I don't buy their relationship.

[SPOILER ALERT: Why did he have to run off to join a terrorist group when he would be free at 21 anyway? Wouldn't it be better to wait? Then he could stay in school and BE SMARTER. ]

Uncle Wayne, The Crazy Guy. Or Is He?
Uncle Wayne is a minor character, though he plays a major role at the end. As minor characters go, Slated has A LOT of them making them hard to keep track of. Just when you think you got the cast down, another character pops out of nowhere. Wayne is exceptionally memorable because he is supposedly "crazy" with stalker-ish intentions. Yet, Kyla, against her better judgment, always runs into him. He is the character I felt was most cheated because I felt sympathetic towards him. Wayne is the uncle of Phoebe, another one of Kyla's school bullies. It is later revealed that Pheobe saves Kyla's cat. But soon after she is taken away by officials, never to be seen again presumably due to Kyla's tattling. He, reasonably, holds Kyla responsible for his niece's disappearance. Despite his hostile behavior towards Kyla, I felt it was justified and made me visualize him as the loving uncle who cares deeply about his niece. To my disappointment, somewhere along the way, Wayne is no longer the loving uncle, and instead given the role of "bad guy" to move the plot along. And probably so Kyla can come out looking like a saint once again.

It's a pity that he is also given one of the most awkward lines in the entire novel: "Nice to me, Phoebe was." I know rearranging sentence structure can be an artistic choice, but can go wrong in dialogue. This line not only sounds weird on the tongue, but also suggests the relationship isn't quite normal. As if there's a reason why Phoebe shouldn't be nice to her uncle. As if Wayne is an abandoned pet, and Phoebe was nice to him out of compassion. OR Wayne only cares about his niece because she was nice to him. Of course, the unconventional sentence structure may also be used to convey the oddity of Uncle Wayne. Admittedly, I am nitpicking at ONE SENTENCE, but I just really wanted Uncle Wayne to redeem himself somehow. Mostly I just wanted someone to beat up Kyla just so she learns to RUN when faced with danger and not walk straight into it.
Oh, and Kyla also hates broccoli. howcanyouhatebroccoli,itslikemyfavoritegreenvegetable?! Maybe she was force fed broccoli as a child? I would love to know.

Wordbuilding and Plot: Juvenile When You Think About It:
As much as I love the concept, the more I think about the Slated society, the cornier it becomes. In an effort to prevent crime, criminals and terrorists under 16 will be slated. You'll be under government surveillance until 21. Before then, the government pays for your hospital fees and therapy. I'm not sure what happens after you're 21, I assume they take your Levo off and let you roam free. I don't know who came up with this slated program, but it seems like more trouble than it's worth. How people under 16 are running off BEING TERRORISTS? AND CRIMINALS? What crime could they ever commit? Steal gum? Actually, getting your brain washed for stealing gum might be an effective deterrent.

The only plausible situation I can come up with is a secret group of rebels kidnapping children to carry out crimes, telling them nothing will happen to them with the slated system in place. Maybe this is why Ben ad Kyla are so good at running--because they are trained to run from police. Apparently children are more susceptible to manipulation after being slated, but if my theory is correct: they didn't know how to think for themselves to begin with.

Overall, Slated just very disappointing. I liked that it aimed to be contemplative novel that makes us question morals, but as entertainment--I was not impressed. I blame this on Kyla for being as boring as a plank of wood. She MAY seem likable, but it's just an illusion due to everyone else being bullies. Despite my gripes, I still see her as a realistic character, and I liked her tendency to question things. But, I still wish she could crack a joke. Or at least smile once. At first, I thought Kiersten White's Mind Games and Teri Terry's Slated was only similar in character voices. After I read the last few pages, the plot might also be similar. I wasn't a fan of Mind Games, and I fear Fractured, the sequel to Slated, will be an duplicate of that experience.

By Sarah Elizabeth 28 Jan 2013 4

(Source: I won a copy of this book! Thanks to Jenny from 'Chocolate Chunky Monkie', and Orchard Books.)
It's been 9 months since 16-year-old Kyla was slated (a process that strips you of your memories). She's learned to walk and talk again, and now it's time for her to leave the hospital with her new foster parents.

Kyla is different though, unlike all the other mindless 'slateds', Kyla asks questions she shouldn't, and has trouble keeping her monitoring device (Levo) in the 'safe' zone (Slateds are supposed to be 'level' - not too happy or too sad).

Kyla slowly adapts to the new life that she has been given, but the 'Lorders' (the men who maintain the peace), scare her, and she begins to question things even more when people she knows are taken away by the Lorders never to return.

Luckily, Kyla does make friends with another slater - Ben, and also has her slated sister Amy, and her new mom looking out for her.
What exactly is happening though? Why was Kyla slated? And why is she different?

I liked this book, although for a lot of it I felt like I was trapped in the dark with Kyla.

Kyla knew very little, but had a thirst for knowledge that made her different from the other 'slateds'. She didn't know why she was slated, and she wasn't sure she that she wanted to know, although she did know that not everyone who had been slated had had it done to them legally.

I liked the way that Kyla used art as an escape, and how she often learned things by drawing, and then working out what the drawings meant. Kyla had a very active mind for someone who had been slated, as it seemed that the other 'slateds' were a little ditzy and clueless, which wasn't really Kyla at all.
Being slated seems a bit of a scary prospect, although I'm sure plenty of people would love to have the option to forget about their current lives and start over fresh. To do this to someone without their consent is truly despicable though, although I suppose it is slightly better than executing them.

I liked the storyline in this book, although I did think it was quite slowly paced. This was quite a long book at nearly 450 pages, but a lot of it was taken up with Kyla's reintroduction into society, rather than what was actually going on with regard to people being slated, and the 'Lorders'.

What I did want more information on was why exactly certain people were taken. I never really understood why one of Kyla's classmates was taken, and I didn't really get it when a teacher was then taken, purely for making comment about the classmate being taken. Not really sure why this was such a problem? It seemed that anybody could be taken at any moment on a whim, and it just wasn't obvious enough what exactly the government were trying to hide, why they took these people, and what their overall game-plan was.
Kyla did find out some information regarding her own slating, but not enough to really tell her what happened, or what was supposed to happen, although I'm hoping we find out more about this in the sequel.

Kyla and Ben's relationship felt a little odd to me, but I think that was mostly because Ben was a little slater-ish and ditzy at times which sort of put me off him a bit. It was nice to see how different Ben, and Kyla's adopted sister Amy were compared to Kyla, as Kyla really did seem to behave differently to the other 'slateds'.

Thankfully the action seemed to step up in the last 50ish pages, and things happened that I wasn't expecting. Something else happened that I had kind-of guessed at (there were hints throughout the book), but we were left with loads of unanswered questions at the end.

Overall; this book had an interesting premise, but the pace felt a little slow to me. I would be interested to find out what happens to Kyla in the sequel, but I'm not desperate to read it, if you know what I mean.
7 out of 10.

By Kate 23 Sep 2012 5

Slated. 5 of 5 star rating. No review.

By Lisa Scott 02 Jul 2012 3

Slated is definitely a page turner. But once you put it down you are to realize nothing actually happened. This is book one of another young adult book series. The story and ideas are unforgettable and are difficult to argue with. In this book it seems as if the story hasn't even began yet at 439 pages you'd think the protagonist would have made a difference by now. This is a story not finished. I would advise to wait till 2013 when Book 2 comes out (around May) called Fractured before reading it.

By Megan-Jo 04 Jun 2012 5

I read The Hunger Games series not long ago and was convinced it was the best book I had ever read. After reading it I couldn't get into any book, none of them seemed to compare. Not even Nicholas Sparks who was my favourite author. I went from book to book trying to find one to keep my attention for long enough. I saw 'Slated' in the shop and the blurb sounded interesting. I didn't really expect what I read though.
'Slated' is probably the most unique, unforgettable and interesting book ever. Infact if I had to chose between this and The Hunger Games, I couldn't...and that is saying something. The book kept me guessing throughout, and this kept me curious. I couldn't put it down and I read it in just over a weekend. The small bit of romance is perfect to keep you interested but not make you sick.The ending was surprising and I also felt a pang of sympathy for Kyla. I am just upset I have to wait a whole year for the second.
This is a perfect book, infact rating it 5 stars is too low;It deserves 10! I deffiantly suggest this book to anyone! YOU WILL NOT BE DISSAPOINTED!
This is deffiantly

Review quote

A gripping dystopian debut. Bookseller "Everything I have been looking for in a book: suspense, mind-bending mystery, romance and just the right amount of science fiction." "Sophisticated, intelligent, thought-provoking. Watch out Suzanne Collins and Sophie McKenzie, there's a new writer in town." "An original and haunting psychological thriller. I was gripped from the first page and can't wait to read more." Julie Bertagna, author of the Exodus trilogy "Gripping, chilling and all too real. An unputdownable thriller." L.A. Weatherly, author of Angel. "A beautiful, intriguing puzzle revealed piece by dark and sinister piece." Sara Grant, author of Dark Parties. A thrilling futuristic drama... compelling and well written. Bucks Herald There is an Orwellian harshness about this dystopia that makes for disturbing and provocative reading. **** Books For Keeps A tense psychological thriller that makes the hairs on the back of your neck stand on end. Daily Record A terrific read which doesn't give up its secrets lightly. From the first pages it grips. Highly recommended. School Librarian Terry writes with a gripping and exciting fresh voice which makes compulsive reading. Carousel