The Pristine Dao: Metaphysics in Early Daoist Discourse

The Pristine Dao: Metaphysics in Early Daoist Discourse

Hardback Suny Series, Chinese Philosophy & Culture

By (author) Dr Thomas Michael, Edited by Roger T Ames

Currently unavailable
We can notify you when this item is back in stock

Add to wishlist
OR try AbeBooks who may have this title (opens in new window)

Try AbeBooks
  • Publisher: State University of New York Press
  • Format: Hardback | 170 pages
  • Dimensions: 160mm x 230mm x 18mm | 358g
  • Publication date: 10 June 2005
  • Publication City/Country: Albany, NY
  • ISBN 10: 079146475X
  • ISBN 13: 9780791464755

Product description

The Laozi (Daodejing) and the Zhuangzi have long been familiar to Western readers and have served as basic sources of knowledge about early Chinese Daoism. Modern translations and studies of these works have encouraged a perception of Daoism as a mystical philosophy heavy with political implications that advises kings to become one with the Dao. Breaking with this standard approach, The Pristine Dao argues that the Laozi and the Zhuangzi participated in a much wider tradition of metaphysical discourse that included a larger corpus of early Chinese writings. This book demonstrates that early Daoist discourse possessed a distinct, textually constituted coherence and a religious sensibility that starkly differed from the intellectual background of all other traditions of early China, including Confucianism. The author argues that this discourse is best analyzed through its emergence from the mythological imagination of early China, and that it was unified by a set of notions about the Dao that was shared by all of its participants. The author introduces certain categories from the Western religious and philosophical traditions in order to bring out the distinctive qualities constituting this discourse and to encourage its comparison with other religious and philosophical traditions.

Other books in this category

Showing items 1 to 11 of 11

Review quote

"The overall argument is a direct challenge to the prevailing tendency to read much early Daoism politically. The author confronts this issue directly and makes a very strong case for an essentially religious reading. As a result of this work, we can now proceed to make more intelligent and interesting comparisons of Chinese Daoism with other religious traditions."