Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S.Science Policy

Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S.Science Policy

Hardback Suny Series in Science, Technology, and Society

By (author) Daryl E. Chubin, By (author) Edward J. Hackett

Currently unavailable
We can notify you when this item is back in stock

Add to wishlist
OR try AbeBooks who may have this title (opens in new window)

Try AbeBooks
  • Publisher: State University of New York Press
  • Format: Hardback | 267 pages
  • Dimensions: 155mm x 229mm x 20mm | 567g
  • Publication date: 1 September 1990
  • Publication City/Country: Albany, NY
  • ISBN 10: 0791403092
  • ISBN 13: 9780791403099
  • Illustrations note: , black & white tables
  • Sales rank: 1,728,827

Product description

This book examines the structure and operation of peer review as a family of quality control mechanisms and looks at the burdens placed on the various forms of peer review. Assuming that peer review is central to the functioning of U.S. science policy, Chubin and Hackett explore the symbolic and practical value of peer review in the making, implementing, and analysis of this policy.

Other books in this category

Showing items 1 to 11 of 11
Categories:

Author information

Daryl E. Chubin is Senior Analyst in the Science, Education, and Transportation Program, Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress.Edward J. Hackett is Assistant Professor in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Review quote

Peer review is the principle on which the internal governance system of science has traditionally depended. During the past ten years there has been a great deal of evidence suggesting that that assumption is no longer valid (if it ever was), and that many of the strains in the science-government relationship in the US are traceable either to the assumption itself or to the ways it is implemented. Chubin and Hackett examine the assumption and its implementation from different perspectives and explore its role in the science-government relationship. The authors display the ability to take peer review and use it as a springboard to illuminate a central issue of our time: the relationship between the conduct of science and the larger society in the US in the waning years of this century. The writing itself colorful, interesting, heartfelt is surprising and refreshing. William A. Blanpied, National Science Foundation"