• Minotaur: Sir Arthur Evans and the Archaeology of the Minoan Myth See large image

    Minotaur: Sir Arthur Evans and the Archaeology of the Minoan Myth (Hardback) By (author) J.A. MacGillivray

    Unavailable

    Sorry we can't get this title, the button below links through to AbeBooks who may have this title (opens in new window).

    Try AbeBooks | Add to wishlist

    DescriptionIn this text, the author argues that the celebrated archaeologist, Sir Arthur Evans, who at the turn of the century claimed to have discovered the labyrinth which housed the Minotaur, was in fact a fabulist. MacGillivray uses Evans's own papers as evidence for his exposee.


Other books

Other books in this category
Showing items 1 to 11 of 11

 

Reviews | Bibliographic data
  • Full bibliographic data for Minotaur

    Title
    Minotaur
    Subtitle
    Sir Arthur Evans and the Archaeology of the Minoan Myth
    Authors and contributors
    By (author) J.A. MacGillivray
    Physical properties
    Format: Hardback
    Number of pages: 384
    Width: 163 mm
    Height: 236 mm
    Thickness: 36 mm
    Weight: 680 g
    ISBN
    ISBN 13: 9780224043526
    ISBN 10: 0224043528
    Classifications

    BIC E4L: BIO
    Nielsen BookScan Product Class 3: T4.0
    BIC subject category V2: BG, HDDK
    BISAC V2.8: SOC003000, HIS002000, BIO000000
    LC subject heading:
    DC21: 939.18092
    Illustrations note
    50 line and 24 halftone illustrations
    Publisher
    VINTAGE
    Imprint name
    Jonathan Cape Ltd
    Publication date
    03 August 2000
    Publication City/Country
    London
    Review text
    This is not just a biography of Sir Arthur Evans, the discoverer or the 'Minotaur's Lair' in Crete, but a history of of Europe during his lifetime, and of archaeology itself. There are numerous diversions to Petrie's work in Egypt, for example, and the territorial machinations in the Balkans. This sets the context for Evans's development, and that of his site in Crete. MacGillivray draws diverse threads together to show not only the influence the times had on Evans (his desperately Eurocentric attitude, for example) but also the influence he had on his times. Among other things, he was instrumental in the settling of border claims in the Dalmations both before and after the Great War. Evans's father and grandfather were both amateur archaeologists. MacGillivray makes a very clear case for background and breeding influencing Evans's interests and development. His father took him on digs in Britain, and as a small boy he was soon making his own ritual burials of dolls and butterflies in the garden. His mother's death in his early childhood set him up to be sympathetic towards matriarchal cults, and this was compounded by the death of his wife not long after they married. This portrait of Evans is quite harsh - he shaped opinion in many fields, none more than his own, but not always accurately. He used his position to quash other people's theories and careers, and claimed all the credit due to others on the Knossos discovery. His half-sister Joan, in her biography, attributed his successes to being in the right place at the right time. Not so MacGillivray, who stresses that Evans researched thoroughly and knew exactly what he was doing when he schemed for the rights to dig at Knossos. This is the story of a man who had a vision, and dug to prove it, ruthlessly twisting the evidence to fit his own theories, perverting the unfolding of history as he went. He jealously guarded his most precious finds, and the truth about Knossos didn't become clear until his records were released after his death, allowing other scholars to study them. While sparing no sympathy for Evans, tyrant and bully, MacGillivray fairly praises his dedication to his task. He also portrays him positively in his conviction. his involvement with and generosity towards the nascent Scout movement, and his devotion and care for his adopted son, John Candy. The overall picture is one of a man who was a product of Victorian England. He always knew best, and felt perfectly secure in his right to ignore the laws and wishes of other countries and their people. But he also supported what he saw as the rights of others, and was very generous with his time, money and property. He wrecked the careers and reputations of fellow archaeologists, but adopted a sickly boy and brought him up in luxury. A fascinating, complex character, examined fairly, without indulgence. (Kirkus UK)