Book details

 

Full description | Reviews | Bibliographic data

  • Full bibliographic data for Anti-monopoly Law and Practice in China

    Title
    Anti-monopoly Law and Practice in China
    Authors and contributors
    By (author) H. Stephen Harris, By (author) Peter J. Wang, By (author) Mark A. Cohen, By (author) Yizhe Zhang, By (author) Sebastien Evrard
    Physical properties
    Format: Paperback
    Number of pages: 292
    Width: 163 mm
    Height: 233 mm
    Thickness: 33 mm
    Weight: 848 g
    Audience
    College/higher education
    General/trade
    Professional and scholarly
    Language
    English
    ISBN
    ISBN 13: 9780195394788
    ISBN 10: 019539478X
    Classifications
    BISAC category code: LAW005000
    Dewey: 343.510721
    BISAC category code: LAW068000
    BIC geographical qualifier: 1FPC
    Nielsen BookScan Product Class: S5.4
    Publisher
    Oxford University Press Inc
    Imprint name
    Oxford University Press Inc
    Publication date
    16 September 2011
    Publication City/Country
    New York/US
    Main description
    The China Anti-Monopoly Law (AML), which became effective August 1, 2008, is the first comprehensive competition law enacted by China. The AML prohibits a broad array of agreements between competitors and commercial counterparties, as well as competitive conduct by single firms that may harm the competitive process. In addition, it establishes a mandatory administrative review procedure for mergers and acquisitions between companies meeting certain sales thresholds, globally or in China. Beyond these fundamental provisions, the AML prohibits certain types of administrative abuses believed to be prevalent in China and establishes a complex set of administrative agencies with broad powers to enforce the law. Anti-Monopoly Law and Practice in China is the first comprehensive treatment of the AML and the practice of antitrust law under this new system. Each chapter on the substantive provisions of the law includes practical advice on approaches to meeting the challenge of complying with the law's requirements, including analysis of likely interpretations and applications of the AML based on precedents in related economic laws and actions by other administrative agencies. Where policy choices are uncertain, the text will explore probable developments in China based on comparable applications of competition laws in other jurisdictions.
    Review quote
    This is an absolutely amazing book. Amazing because it is clearly written, comprehensive and highly relevant and that is a rare beast among law books...If you are an English speaking lawyer involved with China, you need to read this book and keep it on your shelf. Now. China Law Blog What is most striking about this book is its breadth and depth: it discusses almost all conceivable issues related to the AML, and it discusses them in a thoughtful manner. Wentong Zheng, Competition Law Journal
    Biographical note
    H. Stephen Harris, Jr. is a partner in the Washington, DC office of Baker & McKenzie, where he handles U.S. and international antitrust litigation, mergers and acquisitions, and cartel investigations, as well as counseling on antitrust compliance. Peter J. Wang is a partner in the Shanghai and Beijing offices of Jones Day, where he handles complex disputes and antitrust matters in and relating to China, the United States, and worldwide. He also leads Jones Day's China antitrust practice. Yizhe Zhang is a senior associate in the Beijing office of Jones Day, where she specializes in competition law. Prior to joining Jones Day, she was an official with MOFCOM, and was involved in the drafting of the Anti-Monopoly Law. Mark A. Cohen was formerly counsel to the Beijing office of Jones Day, where he specialized in intellectual property matters and technology transfer. He has over 25 years legal experience in China. S bastien J. Evrard is a partner in the Beijing office of Jones Day, where he focuses its practice on competition law in China and the European Union.
    Table of contents
    INTRODUCTION; LEGISLATIVE HISTORY; MONOPOLY AGREEMENT; ABUSES OF DOMINANT POSITION; MERGER REVIEW; CASES INVOLVING GOVERNMENTAL AND QUASI-GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; ENFORCEMENT; COURTS; OTHER COMPETITION-LAW RELATED STATUTES